নাগরিক বিবৃতি – হবিগঞ্জের চান্দপুর চা বাগানের কৃষিজমিতে অর্থনৈতিক অঞ্চল প্রতিষ্ঠার সিদ্ধান্তে গভীর উদ্বেগ

চান্দপুর চা বাগানের মোট ৩ হাজার ৯৫১ একর জমির মধ্যে ৯৫১ একর চাষাবাদের জমি। অনুসন্ধানে আমরা জেনেছি যে সব শ্রমিক পরিবার বর্তমানে এ জমি চাষ করছে তাদের পূর্বপুরুষেরা প্রায় দেড়’শ বছর আগে থেকে চা বাগানের জমি তৈরির পাশাপাশি আবাদী জমিও তৈরি করে। সেই থেকে তারা এ জমি চাষাবাদ করছে। এ জমিতে উৎপাদিত ফসলে তাদের সংসার চলে। এ জমি ব্যবহারকারী অনেক পরিবার আছে যাদের চা বাগানে কাজ নেই। ফলে তাদের জীবন চলে এ জমির উপর নির্ভর করেই। আমরা মনে করি চান্দপুর চা বাগানের শ্রমিকদের সাথে পর্যাপ্ত আলোচনা না করে এবং তাদের অর্থনৈতিক ভাগ্য বিবেচনায় না এনে সরকার কৃষিজমি হস্তান্তর করে চা শ্রমিকদের প্রতি অবিচার করেছে। আমরা দেখেছি জমি রক্ষার চেষ্টায় চান্দপুর চা বাগানের হাজার হাজার মানুষ কৃষিজমিতে ১৩ ডিসেম্বর থেকে প্রতিদিন প্রতিবাদ সমাবেশ করছে।

আমরা চা শ্রমিকদের ব্যবহৃত কৃষিজমিতে অর্থনৈতিক অঞ্চল করার ব্যাপারে চা শ্রমিকদের সাথে পূর্ণাঙ্গ ও খোলামেলা আলোচনার জন্য সরকারের প্রতি আহ্বান জানাচ্ছি। অর্থনৈতিক অঞ্চল দেশের অর্থনৈতিক প্রবৃদ্ধির জন্য গুরুত্বপূর্ণ। কিন্তু দেশের প্রান্তজন চা শ্রমিকদের প্রতি কোনো অন্যায় যাতে না হয় তার জন্য আমরা সরকারের প্রতি অনুরোধ জানাচ্ছি। অর্থনৈতিক অঞ্চল যেমন গুরুত্বপূর্ণ, তেমনি কৃষি ও অন্যান্য উৎপাদনশীল খাতও জাতীয় অগ্রগতির জন্য সম-গুরুত্বপূর্ণ। তাই অর্থনৈতিক অঞ্চল প্রতিষ্ঠা এবং এর প্রয়োজনে জমির সাশ্রয়ী ও ন্যায্য ব্যবহার নিশ্চিত করার লক্ষ্যে একটি বৃহত্তর জাতীয় আলোচনা সূচনা করার জন্য সরকারকে অনুরোধ করছি।

স্বাক্ষরকারী

১.    হোসেন জিল্লুর রহমান
২.    হামিদা হোসেন
৩.    আনু মুহাম্মদ
৪.    খুশি কবির
৫.    শহিদুল আলম
৬.    জ্যোতির্ময় বড়–য়া
৭.    রেহনুমা আহমেদ
৮.    তানজিম উদ্দিন খান
৯.    শামসুল হুদা
১০.    হাসনাত কাইয়ুম
১১.    ফিলিপ গাইন


পিডিএফ ভার্সন [ ডাউনলোড ]

Excluded Groups and Democratization

Excluded Groups and Democratization

Economic progress that Bangladesh has made in recent times is well appreciated around the world. The extreme poverty has also significantly decreased. Yet there are socially and economically excluded groups of people for their identity, captive situation, and various other reasons. Many of these excluded groups live on the fringe of the country, deprived of equal opportunities and facing wide-ranging social, economic and political problems.

By Philip Gain, English | PBK 80 pages, 2015 | Price: Tk. 150 US$5

Lack of political protection is a common problem that the religious minorities and excluded groups face in Bangladesh where ‘Islam’ is the state religion and all people are identified as ‘Bangalees’. Besides, the ethnic conflicts between the indigenous peoples and the Bengalee settlers in the Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT) have not been resolved. Explaining factualevidences, the author also stresses the actions that the state and other actors should adopt to exploreway forward and opportunities for change.

Philip Gain, the author, surveys the links between the socially and economically marginalized and excluded population and political governance in Bangladesh. The author provides a map of the excluded groups in Bangladesh and examines the factors leading to political and social exclusions.

This paper [now updated and published by Society for Environment and Human Development] was first published by Manohar Publishers and Distributors in Delhi, India in 2015 in ‘Political Institutions and Conflict: Essays from Bangladesh and India’.

By Philip GainEnglish,
PBK 80 pages, 2015
Price: Tk. 150 US$5

Seminar and information fair on land deprivation

Seminar and information fair on land deprivation

The Society for Environment and Human Development (SEHD) organized a seminar and information fair on ‘Land Deprivation of Tea Communities and Adivasis of the Plains’ on 20 September 2015.

Land deprivation of tea communities and adivasis
Quazi Monzila Sultana and Sabrina Miti Gain

“Land grabbers brutally murdered my father, Dhudu Soren, on 2 August 2014. My uncle, Goshai Soren was killed in 2011 and so was my grandfather, Fagu Soren, in 1964. The land grabbers killed them to take possession of 2.75 acres of our land. And now I fear that they will kill me too,” said Robi Soren (22) in a seminar on ‘Land Deprivation of Tea Communities and Adivasis of the Plains’. He cried while describing how the land grabbers brutally attacked his family at different times to take away their land.

The Society for Environment and Human Development (SEHD) organized the seminar on 20 September 2015 in Dhaka. More than a hundred representatives of 24 different communities participated in the seminar. Human rights activists, leaders from among adivasi and tea communities, researchers, representatives of different professional organizations, and journalists were among them. Philip Gain, the director of SEHD and Robindranath Soren, the president of Jatiyo Adivasi Parishad facilitated two sessions of the seminar.

In his introductory remarks Philip Gain, director of Society for Environment and Human Development (SEHD), set the tone of the seminar by sharing some facts on reflections on the theme. He told the seminar the tea workers (120,000) spread over 160 tea gardens and with a population of about half a million have been living in the tea gardens of Bangladesh for over 150 years. What is unique of the tea communities of Bangladesh is they own no land they have their houses on and the cropland within the tea gardens they till.

On the other hand, adivasis of the plains in the Northwest and North-centre are increasingly becoming victims of violence over land. Many of them have lost their land in the face of torture, murder, and other oppressions by land grabbers. They always allege that the administration, police and even the judiciary do not provide support to them they deserve.

Appalling stories of deprivation and attacks

What made the seminar unique was horrible stories of land grabbing told by the victims who travelled from North Bengal and tea garden areas. Sicilia Hasda, a Mahle woman from Pachandor, a village in Tanore Upazila of Rajshahi district told her appalling story. Seven Mahle families, including that of Sicilia helplessly witnessed their houses on vested property demolished by their neighbouring Bangalees. The Mahles of Pachandor received the lease of the land first in 1971. The lease was last renewed in 2013.

Some of their Bangalee neighbours, who migrated to this country during the Partition of India and are known as refugees to the local adivasis, demanded that they bought this land from someone else. They received an eviction decree from the court and demolished the houses of the seven Mahle families with the help of the police and the court on 30 March 2014.Sicilia cried and asked, “This land is everything that we have. Where shall we go if pushed out? Why do you come to us during elections and later tell us that we are not citizens of this country?”

Nilima Hembrom, a Santal woman from Chirakuta village of Parbatipur Upazila in Dinajpur narrated the inhuman attack and arson in her village. Bangalees burnt down their houses and ravaged their property after the death of a Bangalee youth in a clash between the Santals and the Bengalis on 24 January 2015, all because of a dispute over 19 acres of land in Chirakuta. Nineteen Santals were arrested after the incident.

Nilima Hembrom filed a case against the attackers. Seven Bengali attackers were arrested but they were released on bail seven days later. Nilima said, “They have money to spend, so they got bail. Our people got out of jail three months later. Four of us are still in prison.”

A cohort of representatives from the tea gardens participated in the seminar. The tea communities are people completely landless. However, gradually they are becoming more vocal about their land rights. Gita Goswami, a labour leader and formerly a pattiwali (tealeaf picker) talked about the khet land, land within tea gardens that the tea communities access to grow crops. “Our forefathers made the land cultivable by cleaning the jungle. If people in villages can own the land for living there, then why won’t we have the ownership of the land that we occupied and cultivated for a hundred years?”

Dr. Hossain Zillur Rahman, a premiere economist of the country and former advisor to caretaker government explained the underlying factors and context of land deprivation of tea workers and ethnic communities. “Economic poverty, vulnerability, and marginalization are three dimensions of poverty,” said Dr. Rahman. “Bangladesh has well addressed economic poverty and vulnerability. Addressing marginality of the tea workers and ethnic communities remains to be a challenge.”

He blamed statistical invisibility as one of the main reasons behind it. He mentioned that there is no official record of the actual population of the tea communities and adivasis in any governmental statistics. He added that the other driving forces of marginality are ethnic specificity, disappearing occupation, vulnerable land rights, and social stigma.

Dr. Tanzimuddin Khan, associate professor of Dhaka University said, “The identity and recognition of adivasis are closely related with their land rights. However, the state is putting more emphasis on the Bangalee nationality and isolating the adivasis.” He commented that the marginal communities are becoming victims of discrimination and oppression because of the inhuman nature of the state.

SEZ in tea garden: The government’s decision to establish a Special Economic Zone in 511 acres of khet land in Chandpore Tea Estate, a tea garden of Duncan Brothers in Chunarughat Upazila in Hobiganj was discussed with importance in the seminar. Khet land is a significant source of food security for the tea workers whose daily wage is Tk.69. Philip Gain informed that the government officials involved did not discuss this with the users of the khet land or even the garden owners and they are unwilling to do so.

Swapan Santal, who came from Chandpore Tea Estate, asked for help from the citizens’ groups. “When we went to talk to the upazila chairman about the economic zone, he castigated us. He even said that we do not belong to this country. If that’s true then why do we vote?”

Anu Muhammad, professor of Jahangirnagar University, advised, “We need to draw the attention of the political leaders who are supposed to oversee these issues. Many times they are not even aware of the problems. They need to have contact with the media and influential people of the government.” He added, “Just being aware is not enough, the land disputes need to be solved by exercising your legal rights.” A proposal was made by the speakers of the seminar to issue a statement on behalf of the citizens asking the government to clarify the issue of the SEZ in Chandpore Tea Estate.

Road to solution: Solutions to the land deprivation of tea workers and adivasis of the plains were discussed in the seminar as well. Some among the adivasis have recovered their lost land with their own efforts in legal fights. One of them is Bichitra Tirki from Jinarpur village of Parbatipur Union of Chapainawabganj. The Oraon woman is now a role model in the adivasi society. She has recovered 48 bighas (one bigha equals to 33 decimals) of her family that the land grabbers illegally occupied with false documents in hand.

“My husband was traumatized by the land grabbers and eventually died for the land which I recovered later. They lost the cases in the lower court and now have appealed to the high court. When I was working on my land on 4 August 2014, they attacked me. They physically assaulted and raped me,” reported Bichitra, who is now stronger than ever.

Barrister Jyotirmoy Barua discussed the importance of keeping land-related documents straight and learning about the laws regarding land issues. He also shared important information about land ownership, “A proper land ownership means when someone has occupied the land for 25 years continuously. However, there is no alternative to knowing the laws in order to resolve land disputes.”

As it is necessary to collect data and regularly writing reports, so is to influence the government to find the solutions to land disputes of tea workers and adivasis. In sharing his experience Dr. Hossain Zillur Rahman said, “When we talk to the representatives in union and upazila level, we never hear any discussion about the problems of these people.”

“In order to address the issues of tea communities, adivasis and other excluded communities, Society for Environment and Human Development (SEHD) and Power and Participation Resource Center (PPRC) are doing the ground work to establish a national resource center and a national platform to give them a voice and raise their issues”, Dr. Rahman told the seminar.

Dr. Tanzimuddin Khan discussed the importance of becoming politically empowered, “If you become politically powerful, not only you would be an important vote bank but also it would be easier for you to solve your problems.”

Alongside the seminar, SEHD organized an information on land issues. SEHD, Human Development Research Center (HDRC), ALRD, BARCIK, Caritas Bangladesh, Toru Pallab, SIL Bangladesh, and Kapaeeng Foundation participated in the fair with their books and other productions on adivasis and tea workers.

The writers are research staff of Society for Environment and Human Development (SEHD).

http://www.dhakacourier.com.bd/land-deprivation-of-tea-communities-and-adivasis/
http://www.thedailystar.net/editorial/platform-represent-marginalised-groups-146980
http://www.thedailystar.net/city/marginalised-groups-ngos-should-merge-rights-efforts-146410

Our Forgotten Communities

Our Forgotten Communities

The state, through its recent law, Khudra Nri-gosthi Sangskritik Pratisthan Ain, 2010 (Small Ethnic Group Cultural Institution Act, 2010) recognizes 27 ‘ethnic’ groups in Bangladesh. However, fresh inventories and review of existing literature summarized and presented by Philip Gain, director of SEHD and lead researcher of the initiative to map the ethnic communities show that there are as many as 50 such communities in the northwest, north-center and the tea gardens of Bangladesh who remain unrecognized, isolated and invisible both constitutionally and statistically.

The little-known ethnic groups in the North-center and Northwest that remain largely invisible are Bagdi, Banai, Bhuiya, Bhuimali, Bhumij, Bindu, Chowhan, Ghatual or Ghatuar, Ganju or Singh, Gorait, Hajra, Hari, Hodi, Kadar, Kairi, Kalwar, Rai Barman (Khastryio), Koda, Kora, Karmakar, Kurmi, Madak, Mahali/Mahle, Malo, Mushohor, Nunia, Pahan, Pal Teli, Robidas, Rajbhor, Rajuar, Singh, Tanti, Telegu, Teli, and Turi among others.Some of these communities are found in the tea gardens. In addition, there are also more than 70 communities in the tea gardens. These are indeed some of the most marginalized and excluded groups of people and ‘captive’ laborers in the tea garden of Bangladesh.

“These communities are faced with severe deprivation. To bring change in their lives, the state and the people of the majority community should feel their deprivation from heart,” said Lukas Kispotta, an Oraon intellect of Dinajpur. “These communities deserve special attention because they offer incredible diversity and value to this nation. The state must adopt right policies to protect these communities.”

To elaborate the issue of deprivation that Lukas Kispotta raised, Bichitra Tirki (34), an Oraon from Rajshahi, sheds her tear as she talks about oppression her Bengali neighbors inflicted on her. In her struggle to protect the family land, she has been severely assaulted—both physically and mentally. Bichitra’s husband Mongla beset by a gang of land grabbers who took control of all his 48 bighas of land (33 decimals is one bigha) died in 1999. The family related the death to shock that Mongla went through for physical attack and mental torture his Bengali neighbors caused to him.

Bichitra fought in the court and conclusively recovered 26 bighas of the family land in 2007 and was hoping to recover the rest 22 bighas that remained under injunction. It was at such stage that last year the land grabbers attacked Bichitra and her family right on their land. They beat her severely, tore her clothes, completely undressed and allegedly raped her.

“We, the adivasis, are repressed non-stop. But the state does not protect us,” accuses Bichitra. “The biggest trouble we face today is attack on our land. The land grabbers are unsettling our life with false cases. We do not get speedy trial and justice in the court. We make equal contribution with our Bengali brethren in building the nation but we are not treated as equal citizens.”

With agony in heart Bichitra Tirki puts a question to the state: “Shall we leave this country? Does the state want to drive us out?”

Dr. Tanzimuddin Khan, associate professor of international relations of Dhaka University reflects on the character of the state and psyche of the majority Bengali for the inhospitable treatment towards the ethnic communities that are frequently reported. “It is for severe criminalizationof the state that it is no more humane.  That the state does not want to ratify Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention 169 reflects its inhumane structure,” said Khan. “The state instead of ensuring equal treatment to all of its citizens, is contributing to further marginalization of the ethnic and excluded communities.”

The current character of the state towards these communities also involves the members of the majority the community “who do not help in the making of state character that is caring towards the minorities and communities in exclusion and helplessness,” added Khan.”It is time for all of us to think about the character of the state and how the state becomes humane and pay special attention to its national minorities and excluded communities.”

It is not just the land-related and social issues that cause despair to the ethnic communities, particularly the little-known ones, there are serious concerns about their languages and cultures. Aside from Bangla, there are some 37 languages spoken by ethnic communities of Bangladesh (according to Justice Habibur Rahman, 2014 in Bangladesher Nanan Bhasha–Different Languages of Bangladesh). The number of languages spoken may increase if proper census is done. There are communities who no more speak their languages and there are others who speak their languages but do not have alphabets. “There are threats of languages spoken by the ethnic communities getting lost. It is important to nurture and preserve alphabets,” said Abu Raihan Miah, ADC General of Dinajpur district. “The adivasi youth need to train themselves on how to protect languages. Many languages spoken today may get lost in the future.”

“The adivasis are losing much of their tradition, knowledge, festivals and glories of the past,” warned Moazzen Hossain of Gram Bikash Kendra (GBK), a Dinajpur based development organization close to ethnic communities and Dalits. “This is a loss not only of the adivasis but also for the nation as well.”

Resolving Land-related Issues

While problems dominated most part of the dialogue, speakers also talked about solution. Abdullah Sarker, Prothom AlocorrespondentDinajpur who has been reporting on adivasi issues urged the NGOs, church bodies and the adivasi organizations to assist the advasis to secure their land title papers. “One big reason for eviction and violence against the adivasis is that their land title papers are not up-to-date.”

ADC General Abu Raihan Miah concurred with Abdullah Sarker. “For solution of land-related problems you need to carefully find out what amount of land you have in your name, have a clear idea of the boundary of your land, check the record, kharij the name and then secure the title,” advised the ADC General who adds, “Adivasis have the same rights like all other citizens of the country. There are criminals around you should stay watchful about.”

Advocate Babul Robidas adds: “The current law, especially East Bengal State Acquisition and Tenancy Act (EBSATA) provides safeguard to the adivasi land. The adivasis should know and make use of this law.”

“The adivasis should also resolve their internal conflicts,” suggested Moazzem Hossain, “and work towards having a permanent land commission.”

Rabindranath Soren, the chair at the dialogue and president of Jatiyo Adivasi Parishad (JAP)appreciated the role of women in struggle for rights. “On the one hand,the adivasi women face oppression and on the other, they stay in the frontline of resistance movement for rights.”

PDF version of report [ Download ]


Report by Philip Gain
The writer is director of Society for Environment and Human Development (SEHD)

First Published: Dhaka Courier, 30 April 2015

Training on Strengthening Organizations of Tea Workers and Adivasis

Training on Strengthening Organizations of Tea Workers and Adivasis

In his reflection on the tea workers’ condition, Rambhajan Kairi, the general secretary of Bangladesh Cha Sramik Union (BCSU), said, “The tea workers are living a miserable life. They are deprived of most of the basic civil rights. It is necessary for the tea workers to develop their skills and capacity in order to expose their problems to the policy makers, media, and people in general.”

Challenges of CSOs and CBOs among adivasis and tea workers: In group work [on the second day], the participants focused on the civil society organizations (CSOs) and community-based organizations (CBOs) in the light of the condition of the organizations they represented, the challenges they face, and what they need in dealing with their condition and challenges. The key challenges they identified their organizations face include legal status (of the 16 organizations represented at the workshop only five had primary registration and none had NGO Affairs Bureau registration); lack of organizational infrastructure; lack of skills to build resources; geography (many are located in remote areas); lack of communication with others (including the media and administration) and networking; lack of planning; lack of credibility and transparency; lack of participation of women in the activities of the  organizations; lack of unity; lack of adequate political awareness and protection; inefficiency in preparing reports; lack of state recognition of the adivasis and other communities who are not Bangalees; hardship; lack of knowledge about ILO conventions that define rights and protection of adivasis and occupational groups; lack of capacity to engage in effective lobby and advocacy; lack of good governance; lack of capacity to be sustainable, lack of ability of mainstreaming the marginalized communities; lack of knowledge about government policies and mechanisms (including their analysis and updates); lack of capacity to study and interpret national and international laws and instruments that relate to trade unions,  tea communities and adivasis; and hostility of the people of majority community.

Overcoming the challenges: The participants also discussed what they think about overcoming such wide-ranging challenges. Some of them are: securing registration of the organizations with appropriate legal authorities; updating and putting the constitution of the organization in practice; proper use of IT; organizing special training on research; documentation and publication; engaging in research and publication; collation and preservation of traditions, traditional knowledge and cultural elements; syndicating reports on deprivation and abuses; training and orientation of organizations of adivasis and tea communities on national and international conventions and laws related to their rights and sharing national and international instruments; establishing legal aid mechanisms; organizing skill and capacity training on specific issues; engaging in issue-based campaigns and scaling up skills for such campaigns; establishing networks among organizations of tea communities and little-known ethnic communities; increasing communication with stakeholders (governmental, non-governmental and donor agencies); training on project formulation and fund raising and developing funds with local resource, etc.

Bhupesh Roy, head of program of GBK, talked about how to improve organizational capacity and accountability. He discussed the essential instruments of an organization. The foremost of these instruments is the constitution (memorandum and rules and regulations). He reflected on how to develop an organizational constitution and how an organization becomes accountable at different levels.

Ahsan Ali, director, finance and administration of PRIP Trust talked about setting up of financial management of an organization in the last day of the workshop. He shared practical tips on different methods and techniques of effective financial management.

Developing Capacity Building Tools (manual): At a session, the participants brainstormed to outline the contents of a capacity building toolbox (or manual) for CSOs and CBOs.

In the last session of the workshop on the third day, Moazzem Hossain, the chief executive of GBK encouraged the adivasis to strengthen their own organizations to fight for rights and protection of diverse cultures.


 

PDF version of the report  [ Download ]